eCommons

 

Short Sales, Long Sales, and the Lee-Ready Trade Classification Algorithm Revisited

Other Titles

Abstract

Asquith, Oman, and Safaya (2010) conclude that short sales are often misclassified by the Lee-Ready algorithm. The algorithm identifies most short sales as buyer-initiated, whereas the authors posit that short sales should be overwhelmingly seller-initiated. Using order data to identify true trade initiator, we document that short sales are, in fact, predominantly buyer-initiated and that the Lee-Ready algorithm correctly classifies most of them. Misclassification rates for short and long sales are near zero at the daily level. At the trade level, misclassification rates are 31% using contemporaneous quotes and trades and decline to 21% when quotes are lagged one second.

Journal / Series

Volume & Issue

Description

Sponsorship

Date Issued

2012-01-12

Publisher

Keywords

Lee-Ready algorithm; short sales; classification

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

Required Publisher Statement: © Elsevier. Final version published as: Chakrabarty, B., Moulton, P. C, & Shkilko, A. (2012). Short sales, long sales, and the Lee-Ready trade classification algorithm revisited. Journal of Financial Markets, 15(4), 467-491. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

Rights URI

Types

article

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record